VERGONHA, NOJO E REVOLTA - A ESCUMALHA INTERNACIONALISTA, EM DESESPERO, MOSTRA A BAIXEZA QUE ESTÁ POR DETRÁS DA MÁSCARA DEMOCRÁTICA
Do PNR:
Na Bélgica já se proíbe a divulgação da verdade...
[10/11/2004]
O Supremo Tribunal da Bélgica ilegalizou o Vlaams Blok, partido nacionalista e regionalista da Flandres, quando este caminhava a passos largos para ser o maior partido do país.
Pegando em afirmações retiradas de sites locais do Vlaams Blok, os tribunais decidiram que estas, embora referissem situações verdadeiras e corroboradas por dados estatísticos (índices de criminalidade, despesas de segurança social e maus-tratos infligidos pelos islamitas às mulheres) poderiam ser interpretadas como incitamento à discriminação e que eram feitas não com fins informativos mas sim com fins criminosos (sem contudo se provar que supostos “fins criminosos” seriam esses). Perguntamos então: é crime revelar a verdade sobre a hipocrisia e a podridão deste sistema, sobre os factores que contribuem para o aumento da criminalidade e sobre a colonização de que países como Portugal e a Bélgica estão a ser vítimas através da imigração descontrolada? Respondam-nos os democrápulas do sistema que nos domina: se a verdade puder incentivar à revolta das populações, é legítimo silenciar a verdade? Numa atitude típica de quem vê que os seus dias estão a chegar ao fim, este sistema podre está a deixar cair a sua máscara e, como as suas ideias e políticas caducas já não pegam, começa a silenciar descaradamente os mais incómodos.
Com base nesta condenação, qualquer pessoa que milite no Vlaams Blok ou tenha ajudado nas suas campanhas poderá ser presa. Temos pois mais de um milhão de cidadãos belgas na iminência de serem detidos. Tratar-se-á de gente criminosa ou de pacatos cidadãos, preocupados com a sua segurança, a sua cultura milenar e a forma como está a ser gasto o dinheiro dos seus impostos?
Ainda esta semana, um novo partido será apresentado na Bélgica. Fundado pelos dirigentes do Vlaams Blok com o intuito de o substituir, chama-se Vlaams Belang e continuará a revelar a verdade, só que de uma forma mais subtil. Porque o sistema nunca conseguirá destruir a verdade! Mas a verdade acabará por destruir o sistema!
Do site do Vlaams Blok:
TODAY WE WERE EXECUTED. BUT WE WILL RISE.
Today (9 November), our party, the Vlaams Blok, has been condemned to death. This afternoon, the Belgian Supreme Court upheld the verdict, issued by the Court of Appeal in Ghent on 21 April, which declared the Vlaams Blok a criminal organisation. In order to preserve our party members from prosecution, we are now forced to disband. What happened in Brussels today is unique in the Western world: never has a so-called democratic regime outlawed the country's largest political party.
The Vlaams Blok was supported by almost 1 million voters in last June's elections. We got 24.1% of the vote in Flanders, where 60% of the Belgian population lives. Voting is compulsory in Belgium and no other party was supported by more people. Our party has grown continuously for two decades. Since 1987, it has won twelve consecutive elections in a row. Belgium, established in 1830 by French revolutionaries, is an artificial construct dominated by the Socialist Francophone minority in Wallonia. Our party's main objective is the secession of Flanders from Belgium. Flanders is the free-market oriented Dutch-speaking and politically minorised northern part of the country.
We are the democratic voice of an ever growing number of Flemings who, in an entirely non-violent way, want to put an end to Belgium. Our electoral strength is causing panic amongst the Belgian establishment. A recent opinion poll of the Brussels newspaper Le Soir and the Francophone state television RTBF (24 October) indicates that the Vlaams Blok currently stands at 26.9% of the Flemish vote.
Despite the fact that a political party should be fought in the voting booth, the Belgian regime has been harassing the Vlaams Blok with criminal prosecutions for over a decade. The Belgian Parliament, where Francophones are overrepresented, changed the Constitution in 1999 in order to limit freedom of expression. It also voted a series of new laws with the sole purpose of criminalising and defunding our party, including an Anti-Racism Act and an Anti-Discrimination Act which define "discrimination" so broadly that every individual can be prosecuted on the basis of them. (The text of these infamous bills can be found on our website www.flemishrepublic.org).
Moreover, according to Belgium's draconian new laws, every member and collaborator of an organisation that propagates "discrimination," can be punished with fines or imprisonment. Furthermore, the onus of proof has been reversed, so that the complainant does not need to prove that the accused "discriminates" or propagates "discrimination," but the latter has to prove that he does not.
Since 1993 the power to prosecute for discrimination and racism was transferred to a government quango, resorting directly under the Prime Minister, the so-called Centre for Equal Opportunities and the Fight against Racism (CEOFR). This quango has now been vindicated by the Supreme Court, an institution composed of political appointees, half of them Francophones.
Have we ever condoned discrimination on the basis of race? No, but that did not matter to the Belgian establishment and its political courts. We were condemned on the basis of a selection of excerpts from texts provided by the CEOFR. These excerpts were taken from an anthology of no more than 16 texts published by local Vlaams Blok chapters between 1996 and 2000. According to the court what we wrote was not necessarily untrue, but our "intentions" were of a criminal nature. The Ghent ruling, today reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, stated that our texts (though some were mere quotes of official statistics on crime rates and social welfare expenditure and another was an article written by a female Turkish-born Vlaams Blok member about the position of women in fundamentalist muslim societies) were published with "an intention to contribute to a campaign of hatred. " Such a procès d'intention (a conviction based on speculation about our supposed motives) is a real disgrace, and the fact that the Belgian judiciary had to resort to this proves that no other reasons for convicting us could be found. We have never propagated, advocated or practised any discrimination. Never.
The consequences of the conviction are, however, serious. According to the law, every member of our party or everyone who has ever cooperated with it, even if he has not committed any crimes himself, becomes a criminal by the mere fact of his membership of or his cooperation with our party. The Ghent verdict literally stated: "Rendering punishable every person who belongs to or cooperates with a group or society [...] serves as an efficient means to suppress such groups or societies, as the lawmaker intended. Rendering punishable the members or collaborators of the group or society inherently jeopardizes the continued existence or functioning of the group or society [...]."
Indeed, the reaffirmation of the Ghent verdict by the Supreme Court forces us to disband our party in order not to endanger its members and collaborators. Therefore, a party congress next Sunday will convene to officially disband the party. We will, however, put to the congres the establishment of a new party to defend the political priorities that the Vlaams Blok has always fought for: an independent and democratic Republic of Flanders; the traditional moral values of Western civilisation; and the right of the Flemings to protect their national identity and their Dutch language and culture.
I thank those who founded our party in 1977 and all who have supported it in the past 27 years. They have fought the good fight. I thank our one million voters. They deserve a democracy. Belgium does not want to grant them one; we will. Today, our party has been killed, not by the electorate but by the judges. We will establish a new party. This one Belgium will not be able to bury; it will bury Belgium.
Frank Vanhecke, MEP
Vlaams Blok Party Leader
1 Comments:
Até o Marcelo Nuno Duarte Rebelo de Sousa, a propósito da pedofilia, disse que a Bélgica não era exemplo para ninguém, a respeito da demora e do mau decorrer dos processos. Quanto à Democracia também é verdade. A Bélgica sempre foi uma Democracia mesmo desde 1830, de tal forma que é aquela Democracia à força, que não o é, onde até votar é obrigatório. E onde se pode limitar o que se quer, deixando de ser Democracia. E eu pergunto: onde está o Poder Moderador do Chefe de Estado, suposto Representante da Identidade Nacional e do todo Popular?
Imperador
Enviar um comentário
<< Home