MENOS UM...
Um dos clérigos muçulmanos que mais incitam ao ódio contra o Ocidente, abandonou finalmente o Reino Unido, depois de ter sabido que as autoridades inglesas estavam a investigá-lo por traição.
Portanto, um dos mafométicos mais babados de raiva de entre os que maculam o solo europeu com a sua desagradável, inútil, peganhenta e perigosa presença, resolveu dar de frosques depois de perceber que os Bifes não se acaçagaram com as ameaças que ele e sua ralé lhes atiraram ao bestunto.
Mas uma coisa parece certa - o sujeito, onde quer que tenha ido esconder as suas ventas envoltas em turbante, não se deixará ficar quieto. Gente desta só pára quando explode em pedaços ou quando lhe espetam com pesada dose de chumbo pela cachola adentro.
Portanto, um dos mafométicos mais babados de raiva de entre os que maculam o solo europeu com a sua desagradável, inútil, peganhenta e perigosa presença, resolveu dar de frosques depois de perceber que os Bifes não se acaçagaram com as ameaças que ele e sua ralé lhes atiraram ao bestunto.
Mas uma coisa parece certa - o sujeito, onde quer que tenha ido esconder as suas ventas envoltas em turbante, não se deixará ficar quieto. Gente desta só pára quando explode em pedaços ou quando lhe espetam com pesada dose de chumbo pela cachola adentro.
posted by Caturo at terça-feira, agosto 09, 2005
8 Comments:
Desculpe lá ter postado aqueles cinco textos enormes atrás, mas pareceu-me que os seus assuntos eram demasiado graves para se deixarem passar. A quinta, a do Lord Chancellor, adequava-se mais a este Original Post, mas já era tarde, só surgiu depois. A quarta, essa sim, tem mais a ver com o Original Post onde foi postada.
Não peça desculpa, foi um bom trabalho. Se eu próprio tivesse mais tempo, também publicava aqui as notícias que saem no site do BNP.
Retirei só os mais importantes / graves. Se achar conveniente fazer eco deles em textos particulares no Gladius, talvez seja melhor, em especial dando ênfase aos pontos cruciais, e especialmente porque "o pessoal dos blogues não tem paciência para textos muito grandes".
Anonymous said... "o pessoal dos blogues não tem paciência para textos muito grandes".
É verdade!
«Anonymous said... "o pessoal dos blogues não tem paciência para textos muito grandes".
É verdade!»
Eu sei, especialmente em Inglês, mas o seu conteúdo era demasiado importante. Como disse, é preferível que se faça um resumo comentado no Gladius.
Por amor de Deus! Os Britânicos são atacados por estrangeiros na sua própria casa, como já nem os estrangeiros são atacados, querem bloquear a Lei do Blair em nome da mania de submeter a liberalidade e adaptabilidade da Lei Britânica aos devaneios universalistas duma lei única e desajustada, que nem sei mesmo se a Grã-Bretanha alguma vez subscreveu, a Rússia, nosso último reduto, transforma-se num ninho de mafométicos misturistas que poderia fazer guerra santa para obrigar os últimos Europeus a rezar de cu para o ar e a casar com magrebinos e afins, e a única coisa que sabe dizer é: "Olha, que chatice, é verdade, que textos tão longos! Vou mas é voltar a enfiar a cabeça debaixo da areia, que lá está mais quentinho!..."
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=458
Victory for Arthur and Rights for Whites
10th August 2005
News article filed by Lee Barnes
On the 27th July 2005 history was made in Britain. For the first time in modern history the Race Relations Acts were held to cover the racial rights of White people who are members of the British National Party. This now means that any organisations or companies that discriminate against a member of the British National Party are guilty of anti-white racism. This includes the Police and the Government.
In the Employment Appeals Tribunal, the Embankment, London before the President of the Appeals Tribunals in Britain Mr.Justice Burton the case of Arthur Redfearn v Serco was heard and history was made.
Incompetent tribunal
After suffering the debacle of an incompetent preliminary tribunal who initially ruled against him, Mr.Redfearn took his case to the Employment Appeals Tribunal. Arthur, a sitting councillor for the BNP and a driver for disabled children who is disabled himself, was sacked from his job by minions of the organisation Serco who employ 25,000 people across the country, under the duplicitous pretext of ' Health and Safety ', as far-left thugs linked to the Trade Union Council and Unison trade union, had threatened to throw bricks at his van as he was driving the children to work.
The Serco company then dismissed him from his employment. This set a very dangerous precedent. If this ruling had been allowed to stand it would have allowed companies with a white work force to dismiss ethnic minority people from employment if members of that white work force had threatened to cause violence at work or attack the property of the company itself if they did not dismiss the ethnic minority employees. White employers who did not want to employ ethnic minority people could then dismiss from employment ethnic minority employees from their companies on the grounds of Health and Safety and thereby bypass thirty years of the Race Relations Acts. This ruling could have been used by Muslim employers forced by law to hire white people to sack all white employees on the grounds that other Muslim employees had threatened to attack them. White employers could have said that a threat to them or their company justified sacking all black and Asian workers from the company.
The permutations of possibilities and problems were vast. Yet the initial tribunal, in an act of colossal incompetence, not only misunderstood the existing law but also failed to understand the import of allowing this decision to stand. The fact is that the initial tribunal failed to understand that even White people, as well as ethnic minorities, in this Multi-Cultural state have civil rights protecting them from racism.
The full judgement is listed; here
European Commission “witness”
What was very alarming to myself as an witness to the Tribunal proceedings was the presence of a 'representative' of the European Commission sitting on the Tribunal panel as a witness. This was an indirect way of putting pressure on the Tribunal to give a judgement that the European Commission wanted, and represents an unprecedented attempt to interfere in the democratic legal process of a British Tribunal. It is of immense credit to the Tribunal panel that they resisted this disgusting attempt to interfere in the British legal process.
In the Judgment from the Tribunal you will also notice that the so called 'independent witness' from the European Commission may have actually briefed the legal team for Serco on how the European Commission wished to see the European Race Directive interpreted before the case began that morning. The legal team of Serco then introduced this information and legal reasoning into their case as an late addendum to their final skeleton argument that can only have been passed to them on the morning of the Tribunal case itself from the European Commission representative. This suggested to me that the so called ' independent witness ' from the European Commission had been assisting Serco's legal team with suggestions of legal reasoning and interpretation of the Directive, in order to assist their case against Mr. Redfearn. If this is true then this was an attempt by the European Commission to interfere in the independent actions of British Tribunal that smacks of Stalinism.
The decision of this tribunal was that the initial tribunal were incompetent in their deliberation of the case, that the case must go before a new tribunal who are competent to hear it, and that the legal rules and reasoning within the Appeal Tribunal decision must be adhered to by the new tribunal. We will of course let readers know when the new hearing is going to be held.
Ethno-specific organisation
The British National Party is a political organisation dedicated to representing the rights of the indigenous White British people and the preservation of our culture, environment, religious and social interests. The BNP is an essential organisation for indigenous whites in Britain as under Multi-Culturalism the only ethnic group that does not have ethno-specific representation within the government and state structures are indigenous whites. Whilst Muslims, Asians, Blacks, Jews and all other religious and racial groups have unelected 'community leaders' invited in by government and the Police to promote the interests of their communities, only indigenous Whites are denied this right to racial representation. With indigenous White people expected to become a minority in Britain by 2050, and in many of our towns and cities whites already have minority status, then the necessity for an ethno-specific White indigenous political party to be able to represent the specific interests of the White indigenous people is of paramount importance as our society grows increasingly more multi-cultural.
The fact that indigenous whites in this country are now the primary victims of racist attacks by ethnic minority groups in this country and are suffering ever extreme forms of racism such as suicide bombings by immigrants, but have no right of direct ethnic representation in liaison with the government or the Police, cannot be allowed to continue. The British National Party, unlike the so called ethnic minority ' community leaders ' that infest the echelons of government and police community representation boards, has a direct democratic mandate from the indigenous people of this land to represent their ethnic interests within the democratic political process. We are voted into power, no-one elected any of the community leaders who liaise with the Government and the Police. The fact that everyone knows when they vote for the BNP that they are voting for an ethno-specific political organisation means that the percentage of votes we get in elections is a direct democratic mandate from those people for us to represent their political and social interests in their communities.
Community leaders
The fact that the Police and the Government still refuse to allow BNP representatives the right, as all other races have in this country, to act as ' community leaders ' of the White indigenous people of Britain even though they, unique amongst all racial groups, have a democratic electoral mandate to do so, is an example of Institutionalised Racism by the Government, Councils and the Police. The Police have also in place a policy of institutional racism against indigenous White people barring members of the BNP from joining the police whilst also having a recruitment policy that allows members of Sinn Fein, the PLO, Saddam Hussein’s Baathist Party, ETA and various Islamic groups to join the Police. This is an example of anti-White racism that the BNP will be taking to court when the Police seek to use this draconian order from David Blunkett. The fact that Sir Ian Blair of the Metropolitan Police was found guilty of racism against White Police officers only a few weeks ago shows how the Police have become an institutionally racist organisation and are out of control.
The mainstream political parties are more interested in promoting ' inclusiveness and diversity ' and representing the political, economic and social interests of ethnic minority groups rather than representing the interests of the indigenous White British people of these Islands. In a country such as ours where White people are being swamped by mass immigration and their rights being removed in the name of Political Correctness, then the need for the BNP to represent the interests of indigenous Britons in the political process has to be regarded as an essential foundation for the future social and political development of the White Community itself. If we do not have a political voice and a political party that speaks up for our people in the Modern Multi-Cultural State, then we as White Britons will be ignored and marginalised both socially and politically and others, from immigrant groups who do have a political voice within the establishment parties, will be able to impose their will upon us.
The process of Multi-Culturalism is, we are constantly being told, permanent and irrevocable. Therefore the time has come for White British people to participate fully in that process and not stand impotent outside it. As we are now suffering the horrors of Multi-Culturalism in our lives and communities such as ever escalating anti-White racism, then we must start to organise to ensure our Group Rights and collective social and political interests are protected within the Multi-Cultural State itself.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=457
A taste of Arabia - in Wales!
9th August 2005
News article filed by BNP news team
Symbol of domination or welcome addition to Cardiff skyline?
Cardiff is to get its very own chunk of Arabia following the announcement of a new mosque in the city which will be the biggest in Wales and one the largest in the whole of the UK.
The existing mosque in Woodville Road in the Cathays district is in a renovated warehouse but such is the rapid growth of the Muslim community in Cardiff that the existing premises are inadequate and the new Medina mosque will include a prayer hall for over 3,000 people, a school with five classrooms, an Islamic library, residential accommodation for the imam and underground parking for over 150 cars.
Exotic flora
A computer generated picture of the proposed mosque, which will take a year to build is posted above. One wonders if the planners have any knowledge of Cardiff and whether the Cairo based architects, working with the Somerset based FW Beresford Smith and Partners were painting a picture which could have come straight from Saudi Arabia or Egypt. As the picture shows the building will have four giant minarets soaring into the South Wales sky and for that added eastern flavour – non Welsh palm trees! Only the spice traders in the street outside are missing from the picture.
If any doubting Thomas among the British traditionalist majority needed any further evidence that Islam is totally incompatible with British traditions then this giant mosque should be all that is needed.
Colonial symbol
The architectural style cannot by any stretch of the imagination be seen as Welsh, it is not in keeping with Welsh or any other British building styles, whether contemporary, Victorian, Georgian, Tudor or earlier. This is a massive building which demonstrates the extent of colonisation by the Muslim community in a British city. It is a symbol of Islamic domination or intent to dominate following the manner in which Norman dukes built intimidating stone keeps in the middle of what had been Anglo-Saxon communities and in the same way that Edward I built a string of stone walled castles throughout northern Wales.
“Landmark”
"This is a landmark building for Cardiff, Wales and the UK," said chairman of the Muslim Education and Welfare Society of Wales, Mohammad Javed. He added "It is a fantastic building, which looks set to become a tourist attraction."
No one is disagreeing that it may have a beautiful character but not in Cardiff! There are many aficionados of all architectural styles and those who prefer Islamic architecture already have plenty of destinations to chose from; Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and into more exotic central Asia.
If the Muslim community of Cardiff wanted to show any accommodation, any compromise with their British hosts the mosque would have been built in a rather more modest style, perhaps in locally quarried stone with a slate roof and an avenue of native beech or oak instead of palm trees. Instead they have chosen a design which is nothing less than a symbol showing that they, the adherents of Islam have conquered Cardiff.
The community might even have chosen a more British name, something evocative of Wales such as Red Dragon, Merlin, Glendower or even the municipally functional South Wales Mosque, instead of naming their building after Islam's second holiest city in Saudi Arabia.
It is akin to Britons erecting a replica of Lincoln Cathedral in downtown Riyadh, but of course the Saudi authorities would never consider a planning application of that nature and neither are we demanding that they do so.
Lack of objection
The planning application, number 04/2586/C, went through without objection and was given approval by Cardiff City Council on the 15th December. Many will ask the question where was the opposition? Does the lack of any objections really mean the people of Cardiff genuinely embrace multi-culturalism and really do want a giant piece of Arabia in their city, or perhaps it was ignorance, apathy or cowardice a fear that objectors might be branded racist and intolerant and the usual meaningless epithets from the multi-cultis.
It may be too late for the people of Cardiff to stop the mosque going ahead but for the British majority in other towns and cities around the country there are countless ways of preventing unwanted mosques being built in neighbourhoods. It doesn’t take too much effort to obfuscate and stop these centres of an alien religion being built on our land. Planning applications are subject to strict observation and checks. Lodging objections on the grounds of noise, traffic, concerns about environmental impact, loss of business due to building works etc, all can be lodged in a manner which cannot be deemed in any way “racist”. Of course it is not and never has been “racist” to object to the construction or redevelopment of a mosque. Muslims are not a racial group, there are white European converts to Islam, Arab Muslims, African Muslims, Oriental Muslims. Islam is a religion, a religion that is alien to Britain.
The choice is ours and ours alone, we can either roll over and channel hop our multi-channel digiboxes and ignore the construction sites of mosques, Islamic schools and community centres or start acting like responsible adults who want a British future for our children and grandchildren.
Enviar um comentário
<< Home