INTEGRAÇÃO SUICIDÁRIA
O governo inglês quer que todos os adolescentes do País participem numa cerimónia pública de cidadania, para jurarem lealdade à Pátria britânica como forma de reforçar a sua «inglesidade» e combater o extremismo islâmico.
Assim se vê que os labrostes conservadores ingleses ainda não perceberam que querer integrar os muçulmanos numa sociedade ocidental para evitar o terrorismo, é como engolir uma granada que vem parar às mãos só para que a explosão não lance estilhaços à pele do rosto.
Ainda para mais, é sabido que um dos terroristas do dia 7 de Julho, tinha feito um juramento desses. Enquanto não se perceber, no Ocidente, que o Islão recomenda ao crente que minta ao infiel se tal for necessário para poder atacar esse mesmo infiel mais tarde (é o «kitman» e a «taqyya»), enquanto não se perceber isto, o perigo islâmico crescerá sempre até fazer cair a civilização europeia.
Assim se vê que os labrostes conservadores ingleses ainda não perceberam que querer integrar os muçulmanos numa sociedade ocidental para evitar o terrorismo, é como engolir uma granada que vem parar às mãos só para que a explosão não lance estilhaços à pele do rosto.
Ainda para mais, é sabido que um dos terroristas do dia 7 de Julho, tinha feito um juramento desses. Enquanto não se perceber, no Ocidente, que o Islão recomenda ao crente que minta ao infiel se tal for necessário para poder atacar esse mesmo infiel mais tarde (é o «kitman» e a «taqyya»), enquanto não se perceber isto, o perigo islâmico crescerá sempre até fazer cair a civilização europeia.
posted by Caturo at quinta-feira, agosto 11, 2005
3 Comments:
http://www.geocities.com/irnationalsocialism/croatia.html
Are Croatians Persians?
Identity of Croatians in Ancient Iran
April 23rd, 2002 Submitted by our Croatian friend White Male
Summary: The people of Croatia, a separated republic of the former Yugoslavia, are almost fully certain about their Iranian origin. The issue was reiterated in a symposium held by the Iranian cultural counsellorship in the capital city of Zagreb with the participation of prominent Croat historians and Iranologists. The report prepared by the symposium that was held on September 16, 1998, put further emphasis on the subject from various points of view and presented the documented evidence gathered by the Croat scholars.
Text: To date, 120 Croat and non-Croat university professors as well as several academics have compiled 249 research works of which many have been printed in various publications and thereby have proven that Croats are of Iranian origin.
There are many real evidences about the identity of ancient Croats which all dismiss the theory that Croats are of Slavic origin. Although research works on the Iranian origin of the Croats could not be publicized due to censorship that was widely practiced at the time of the former regime in Yugoslavia, the available documented evidences reveal that the initiator of the effort on research about the Iranian origin of the Croats lived two centuries ago.
In his thesis in 1797, the researcher made a study on the Iranian origin of the Croats and reached the conclusion that the present day Croats migrated from the western part of ancient Iran.
Following the formation of Yugoslavia in 1918, bigot Serbian Slavs known as the "wolves" collected the original copies of the research work and destroyed them in an attempt to conceal the truth about the Iranian origin of the Croats. To date, only some portions of the research work, that has been quoted in a report prepared by the academy of sciences of the former Yugoslavia in 1938, is available.
One of the articles has quoted some police reports that the government in the former Yugoslavia mounted pressures on Iranologists within the period of 1918 to 1990. The article further proves that upon official instructions by the former government, Croats had to be considered middle ages Slavs. For this same reason, all the research works conducted over the origin of the Croats were considered criminal acts and thus prohibited for a period of 70 years. All the research papers compiled by Iranologists were confiscated as documents against state interests and the researchers were imprisoned or sent to detention camps. Four researchers were killed by the Yugoslav secret police for making investigations over the issue.
However, there are other research works proving that 75 percent of the Croats are different in origin from the Slavs from the genetic point of view. On the other hand, studies show that there are less similarities between domestic livestock, poultry and plants in the old time Croatia with those in Europe, lending further proof to the fact that Croats had most probably migrated from a region close to Asia to their present area.
Former Croat homeland and their migration
A manuscript dating back to 1370 B.C. has named the present day Croats and their language as Hurrvuhe (resembling their modern name Hrvati).
In the era of the Achaemenid, especially at the time of Darius and Cyrus I, the name of the eastern Iranian province Harauvatya and the Croats of the ancient Iranian Harauvatis and Harahvaiti have been mentioned 12 times. In addition, two unearthed manuscripts belonging to the Croats living in the second and third centuries B.C. in ancient Iran have referred to the inhabitants of Horouathos and Horoathoi. In the year 418, Aryans were dubbed as Horites and Zachariasrhetor, and in 559 the Aryan horse riders were referred to as Hrvts who lived in the vicinity of Krima and Azova, and in the 7th century Croats were called as Slavs.
Other articles offered to the symposium discussed the formation of the empire at the time of Cyrus the Great, history of the Croats in ancient Iran and the Croat's development from the time of ancient Indians to the time of their migration in the middle ages from the Caucasus through ancient Persia to the present Adriatic and the emergence of the first traces of Croats, which could be classified as follow:
Harahvaiti and Harauvati in Iran and Afghanistan
Hurravat and Hurrvuhe in Armenia and Georgia
Horoouathos in Azov and the Black Sea
Present day Croats Horvati and Hrvati along the Adriatic
First contacts between old-time Slavs and Croats of ancient Iran
Research works have been conducted on the relationship between the language spoken by the Croats and the language the present-day Slavs speak with an aim to identify possible similarities. However, the studies do not dismiss the possibility that the old-time Croats were part of ancient Iran at the time of the Persian Empire who later migrated to Europe and their language change to Slavic.
Meanwhile, studies on the Croats indicate that the old-time Slavs did not share the same race with the East European nations and that with the migration of the Croats with the Iranian origin, they established common cultural and lingual ties with each other.
Ties with old-time Slavs in the 4th century were first established in Red Croatia under the title "Sarmatskim-Horitima" and also after the 6th century in the realm of the Carpathians within the boundaries of White Croatia (meaning "great") under the patronage of the Iranian Croats who had been turned Slav due to the large population of the Slavs.
Iranology and old-time language of Croats
Studies show that there had been various stages in which the Croats had been pressured into accepting the language of the Slavs and annexation into the former Yugoslavia. The idea was realized by the Serb nationalist Vuk Karadzic whose slogan was "Serbs everywhere". He invited all bigot Slavist Serbs to the Vienna Congress in the middle of the 19th century for a political and lingual consensus and for adopting policies for the future of Yugoslavia. In the aftermath of the agreements reached in the gathering the pro-Karadzic Slavists launched their activities for the elimination of all signs of cultural and lingual differences between the Serbs and the Croats. To this end, they changed the history of the Croats and eliminated all the terms with Indo-Iranian roots that did not exist in the Serbian language. Such a trend continued until 1918 when Yugoslavia was formed, and continued during the Yugoslav regime.
The process for the change of the spoken language of the Croats of ancient Iran to the language of Slavs started in the 7th century and continued up to the 20th century, forcefully followed by Yugoslavia.
Mazdaism, ancient myths and religion of Croats
In addition to similarities in language, common cultural aspects can be pointed out as well. For example, reference can be made to the symbols belonging to the old-time Christians that resembled symbols of Mazdaism in ancient Iran.
A study in this connection has drawn a parallel between the language used in Bosnia and littoral states and islands of the Adriatic Sea in two separate sections. The study further elaborates how followers of Mazda in ancient Iran converted to Christianity in Europe and how Mazdaism was spread in Europe by the migration of the inhabitants of the above-mentioned areas.
Other research works have studied the influence of traditions in ancient Iran on the symbols of the roots of old Christianity from ancient times to the middle ages.
Identity of Croat tribes
Research works conducted in the past decade discuss the similarities between names and families used in ancient Iran and the names and families in present-day Croatia. Some of these studies have pointed to the roots of alphabetic letters in the Croat language and stressed that, contrary to the claims of the Slavs, the roots of those letters are totally Iranic and widely used in ancient times. Many manuscripts written with those letters date back to before the 9th century.
Research studies on the style of dress of the Croats show that they were dressed up as the Sassanid's and most of the local costumes of women were exactly the same as those worn by women at the time of the ancient Iranian empire.
Studies on other characteristics of the Croats, such as aquatic navigation, reject the Slav presumption that the Croats were not originally sea navigators and that they learned the art from the Italians. According to the studies, there is evidence available that the Croats were acquainted with sailing even before they encountered the Slavs. It should be noted that local Croat navigators were known as "Indo-Iranian" and "Slavs" in the Adriatic.
Name: Croat Ustasa
From: Croatia
Sent: 1:43 GMT on 25 July
And another article: Visit Page 2 by clicking here
SCHOLARS ASSERT CROATS ARE DESCENDANTS OF IRANIAN TRIBES
ZAGREB, Croatia, Oct 15, 2000 (Hina)
http://www.geocities.com/irnationalsocialism/croatia2.html
SCHOLARS ASSERT CROATS ARE DESCENDANTS OF IRANIAN TRIBES
ZAGREB, Croatia, Oct 15, 2000 (Hina)
"Finally, it has scientifically been proven that Croatians are of Persian origin," exclaimed triumphantly representatives of a scholarly society for the study of Croatians' descent (ZDPPH) last week.
Nedjeljko Kujundzic, the head of the society established in 1992 for just the purpose to help endeavours aimed at "the promotion of the truth about the Iranian descent of Croats," held a news conference last Wednesday when he presented 'final' evidence on this matter. Last Friday, a book entitled "Indo-Iranian Origin of Croats" by writer and historian Mate Marcinko was presented as well.
Two society members, Ivan Biondic and Andrija-Zeljko Lovric, toured Iran last July. There they saw a plaque called "Tablet from Tanais", and heard, as they say, a dialect which resembles the Kaikavian dialect of the Croatian language.
Biondic explained that in the end of the 19th century two stone tablets were discovered with Greek inscriptions of ancient Croat names from the Ancient port of Tanais at the Sea of Azov. The tablets, which date back to 2nd and 3rd century B.C., have early Croatian ethnonyms - Horoathos, Horauathos and Horvathon.
The society's president Kujundzic said that the 'tamburitza' - a Croatian folk instrument - was also preserved in its original form by certain Iranian tribes.
According to him, Swedish geneticists have confirmed, in 75 percent of cases, that Croats are of Iranian origin.
Biondic added that this theory had also been confirmed by American and Canadian Slavists.
In this context he resolutely and completely rejected a thesis of some historians and the belief that the Croats are of Slavic descent.
Surprises for visitors at the news conference were not exhausted. Namely, Biondic informed them of the presumption that Mihovil Lovric, Andrija-Zeljko Lovric's father, was murdered in 1976 because of his thesis on the Iranian origin of Croats!!
Two days after the news conference, the book "Indo-Iranian Origin of Croats" was presented, in which Mate Marcinko collected a score of his texts which he had published in various magazines and papers for 30 years under various pseudonyms. One of them was Horoathos Harahuvat."
Comments our Croatian friend regarding these articles
Excellent. I am glad that you have posted the article. It is important that
the truth about Croatian origins is known to the Persians. The "Iranian
Origins" is now the officially accepted history of Croatian heritage. The
"Slavic Origins" theory was used as an instrument to brainwash Croatians and
to make it easier to take Croatia over.
Today Croatia is an independent country (since 1991), and since then the
"Iranian Origins" theory has resurfaced and become official.
Again, thank you for posting the article, and I wish you and your people all
the best for the future. Keep fighting for your people and make your dream a
reality. Croatians fought and won. Persians shall do the same. Remember, we
are the Noble ones. We are the actual Aryans.
BOG I HRVATI
First Name : Harauvatish
URL :
Comment : May the Persian nation rise once again to its former glory!! A great history, and a great Aryan race. FIGHT AGAINST ISLAM!!! FIGHT AGAINST ZIONISM!!! Save the Persians from the nightmare that has been brought upon them!! BE PROUD OF YOUR ARYAN RACE AND BE PROUD OF YOUR ARYAN RACE AND HISTORY!!! Victory will be yours!!
E-mail( optional ) :
Country(optional) : CROATIA
First Name : Andreas the Italian
URL :
Comment : Death to terrorism! Death to Islamism! Death to zionism! Long live Italian-Iranian people's friendship! Dariush & Parvaneh Foruhar will be revenged!
E-mail( optional ) : fulmine80@excite.it
Country(optional) : ITALIA!!!!!
Back To INSP Home Page
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=461
Debunking the myth of multi-culturalism
11th August 2005
News article filed by BNP news team
For over a generation the British people have been conditioned into accepting, begrudgingly, in most cases, the existence of a multi-cultural society.
Lee Barnes in another hard hitting article debunks the idea that multi-culturalism has any moral, legal or democratic mandate to exist in Britain.
He also suggests that the word "multi-culturalism" is replaced by a more appropriate term. What that term is and how British people have been deceived by successive Tory and Labour regimes read the full article over on Brimstone.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/columnists/brimstone2.php?leeId=57
Welcome to "Brimstone".
BNP "Legal Eagle", Lee Barnes (LLB, Hons) with his very own style of fearless and fiery delivery. Lee writes with vigour, honesty and passion and is never afraid to court criticism, comment and censure.
Back to Brimstone Intro
Multi-Culturalism and Colonisation
11th August 2005
Multi-Culturalism is an ideological artefact of late 20th Century Liberal Humanist political thought and it is not, AND NOR EVER WILL BE, a permanent imbedded national, political and social reality in Britain. Just as we today in modern Britain are no longer forced by law or custom to bend our knee to Queen, Country and the Christian God if we so wish, it is also a fact we in the BNP choose not to bow our knee before multi-culturalism, immigrants, liberals or the media.
The ideology of multi-culturalism is not a divine commandment, and therefore if it is acceptable and legal to question the very existence of God in a secular democracy then it is absurd to suggest that a political party and its members cannot question the existence of a political ideology such as multi-culturalism.
Deceit
The fact is that multi-culturalism is in fact an Orwellian ‘word deceit’ in that it is a phrase used in order to obscure the fact that multi-culturalism is in reality colonisation and immigrants are colonists. The idea that ‘Multiple Cultures’ can exist in a nation that was once exclusively host to its own indigenous culture is in fact a description of New Left Imperialism, as its presupposes that the indigenous peoples must, at some point in the name of democratic methodology, have acquiesced to that process. The fact that the British people were never given the chance to vote on whether they wanted multi-culturalism foisted upon them means that the whole creation of the multi-cultural state has no democratic, legal or moral force. The fact that multi-culturalism in practice has led to the breakdown of the indigenous British society leading to a state of de-culturalisation similar to that of the indigenous Aboriginal people of Australia with similar resultant social ills reveals the damage multi-culturalism has caused us.
The rise in breakdowns of white indigenous family structures, the rise in white indigenous drug abuse, the rise in white indigenous criminality, violence, teenage pregnancy, suicide rates and other examples of communal breakdown and social and individual ennui and anomie can all be traced back to the imposition of mass immigration and multi-culturalism on the indigenous British people.
Once our traditional family, moral and social structures were undermined by the influx of immigrants and the teaching of moral, cultural and social relativism then the bonds that bound the nation as an organic collective began to sunder. This led to the atomisation of the white indigenous community both physically through white flight from expanding immigrant ghettoes and subconsciously as the notion of a white indigenous British nation, people and community were repudiated and reviled by the Establishment Elite in schools and in the media, especially on television.
Our culture and communities were dismantled and destroyed so that others could make their home amongst us. Just as the Native American Indians in America were forced by incoming non-indigenous Americans of all races and creeds to surrender their land and traditions to the incomers, so were we. Just as the Native American Indian tribes succumbed to a sense of helplessness, despair and loss leading to the destruction of the traditional Native American Community and a rise in inter-communal violence, alcoholism and suicide – so did we. Multi-Culturalism is racist in that it destroys the indigenous people upon whose bones and culture it is built.
Gulag mentality
We reject multi-culturalism as it is the most pernicious, murderous and intolerant variant of Marxism yet invented by the ideological heirs of Marx, Lenin and Stalin. Though the physical structures of the Communist death camps and Gulags may have rusted away, the psychological internalisation of the Gulags has become a feature of our very lives themselves. We now live our lives ensnared in a snarl of lies and self censorship that is mockingly called freedom.
We reject multi-culturalism as it rejects us and all that we stand for and all that which has come before us. Multi-culturalism is the murder of the past, the genocide of the present and the death of the future. There is no moral, political or legal duty on us to maintain or enforce either multi-culturalism as a permanent political or social reality in Britain. We had no hand in its creation and we were given no choice as regards its perpetuation. It was imposed upon us by the political actions of a corrupt Imperialist aristocratic elite who ran the Conservative Party in order to profit from cheap labour and by the criminal accomplices of Socialist Genocide in the Labour Party in order to obtain cheap votes by importing in an immigrant voting bloc. Both were criminal regimes whose political decisions have as much moral and legal validity today in Britain as those taken by Hitler in Germany or Stalin in Russia.
Reversing the process
We intend to reverse engineer the damage of multi-culturalism via ‘Democratic Demographic Disengagement’ through the Rule of Law and the democratic electoral process.
If it is an ideological truism that immigrants can easily ‘assimilate’ into a new country, as the Government and the Liberal Elite say they do in Britain, then those immigrants allowed to enter the country during the ‘Era of Criminality’ that defined the late 20th Century and the process of mass immigration into Britain will be able to assimilate very easily back into their own ancestral countries with cultures similar to their own. The fact that immigrants have been said to ‘enrich’ us is irrelevant to the moral, legal and political right for them to be here. The fact is that British chefs are more than capable of cooking a chicken tikka masalla without the British government having to import three million immigrants from the Indian sub continent into the country to cook it for us. If we want to listen to reggae or rap we can download it via the internet or buy it on CD, it doesn’t mean we have to empty the slums of Los Angeles or downtown Jamaica of its residents and ship them to Britain to ensure we get it to hear it in Britain. If you want to marry a mail order bride you are free to move to that country and reside with your purchase over there if you wish, just don’t expect to live in this country with your ‘capitalist slave’ trophy wife. If you want to marry your cousin who lives in a town in the mountains of Kashmir that’s fine, but you will have to live over there if you do.
Some people suggest that because the British people have not voted for political parties that would have ended mass immigration, then we should be stuck with it. That’s fallacious logic.
The foundations of a ‘ Just and True Democratic Decision ‘ are based on four fundamental principles each of which have been undermined in relation to the creation of the multi-cultural state and the influx of mass immigration into the country. These are detailed below ;
A) INFORMED CONSENT
Informed Consent can only occur when we are told what we are voting for and what its short term and long term implications are. The British people were not told about what was being planned by the British State and its lackeys when the process of mass immigration and multi-culturalism began to happen in Britain. They were not told the scale of it, the costs of it in financial terms and nor the costs of it in social terms. The media did not report it impartially and nor did the media allow alternative voices to question what was happening. A false ‘Social Consensus of Silence’ was created that stifled free debate on the issue and that only allowed one side to promote its views in public when the topic was discussed. Therefore the British people were incapable of giving informed consent to what was happening to them and the country both then and now. The same fake ‘Social Consensus of Silence’ still operates today, and all those that question the media bias towards the pro-immigration and pro-multi-culturalism forces in our society are called racists or extremists by the media. Therefore the first fundamental of a ‘democratic decision’ has failed.
B) TRUE AGREEMENT
As the British people were never asked to vote via a national referendum if they wished mass immigration or multi-culturalism to be imposed upon this country then both mass immigration and multi-culturalism have no democratic mandate for their presence in our country. They are both fascistic impositions of the British State upon the people. At no time in the modern British State (as defined after World War One and the rise in Communist thought in Britain post 1917) have the British people been taught a nationalistic consciousness either at school or in society. Orwell himself noted how patriotism was looked down upon by the most well educated intellectual elite, but embraced with instinctive passion by those most poorly educated.
The education systems have been used to denude and extirpate all residual traces of nationalistic or patriotic feeling from youth and our people. The lack of a living consciousness of history, tradition, pride in ones country and culture transmitted to generation after generation of our people resulted in the creation of a psychologically damaged generation of Britons incapable of appreciating those things that are essential to the formation of both individual and national character. The British State stole from generations of our children their ancestral identity and pride in themselves, their country and culture. The schools then spat out the Nineteen Sixties generation of perpetual adolescents who now run the country.
This lack of identity and understanding of their national community meant that generations of our people were incapable of firstly appreciating the importance of their nation and culture and secondly to recognise that it was being destroyed. Therefore their lack of awareness of what constituted ‘Britishness’ meant that even if they were given a choice, which they were not, to vote against mass immigration then they would have been intellectually unable to realise the full consequences of failing to do so. Just as we see the over Nationalisation of the German youth in the Hitler Youth as an abuse of children, the failure to educate British youth about their national culture, history and traditions was also an example of the abuse of our children by the British state. We stole from them their pride in their history, who they are and where they came from and therefore denied them an identity that they could be proud of and call theirs.
C) BEST PRACTICE
The question here to be asked is ‘was mass immigration and multi-culturalism imposed in such a way that society as a whole benefited’ and the answer to this is plainly "NO". The only people to benefit from multi-culturalism are the political and business elite of the country whilst the rest of the indigenous British people have been forced to bear it as a burden for generation after generation. The British people have been forced to bear the burden of unrestricted mass immigration, the farce of the asylum process, the endless influx of illegal immigrants into the country, the criminality and terrorism caused by immigrants, the undercutting or our wages, the abuse of our electoral system through voter fraud, the destruction of our rights and freedoms such as the right to free speech and the endless costs of supporting the colonists within our country. It has cost us billions upon billions of pounds and led to thousands of deaths.
The only people that have benefited are the New Left Imperialists and the Imperialist capitalists. The British people have been forced to abandon their communities and homes as the process of colonisation and multi-cultural ghettoisation has accelerated and the main burden of this has always fallen upon the White Working Class not the Upper Class parasites who scuttle away to a new palatial rat hole whenever the immigrant hordes descend upon their areas. The whole process has been disorganised, chaotic, criminally incompetent and been imposed upon a majority whilst only a minority have benefited from it. The whole notion of best practice being undertaken is absurd. The Establishment Elite have let in war criminals, gangsters, terrorists, thieves, paedophiles, health tourists and religious extremists and given them nationality even though it was in direct conflict with the interests of the British people.
D) THE SOCIAL QUESTION
The final question to be asked is the social question – have multi-culturalism and mass immigration damaged Britain and the British people? I say that yes they have. So would most people if first educated and then asked. From crime, terrorism and disease the impact has been vast and detrimental. It has been unfair on the imported and exploited immigrants and the exploited indigenous British people. It was grossly unfair to give any immigrants the right to enter our country and all the benefits of British citizenship when there were and are millions of indigenous people still living in poverty in this country. The money spent on taking care of immigrants should have been used to raise our people up from the gutters instead of sponsoring a new generation of poor immigrants in the country or being diverted by the Government and the State and used to ‘positively discriminate’ in favour of immigrants in housing, jobs or educational needs. The burden of mass immigration and multi-culturalism fell on the British white working class and all the benefits went elsewhere.
The right of the State to allow limited immigration into the country was abused when the State became a political tool for a political minority and used to initiate the political process of allowing mass immigration into the country. Just as we as individuals have rights and duties we have to abide by as part of the Social Contract, so does the State have rights over and also a duty towards us as part of the Social Contract. It is no use lecturing the primary victims of multi-culturalism, the poor white working class people of Britain, about their lack of responsibility in their individual and social lives when the British State has been utterly irresponsible as regards its duties and responsibilities to those same white working class people as regards allowing the breakdown of the indigenous white working class community through unrestricted mass immigration into the country and multi-culturalism for decades. Only when we see the British State embrace its own duties and responsibilities to us, will we accept being told that we have a duty to the British State. Until then the State is a monster that is merely victimising us, and therefore we regard it as the enemy within not an asset. Not until the State stops forcing us to pay the blood price of mass immigration through crime, terrorism and illegal foreign wars will we accept that the State can tell us to do anything. The State gains it legitimacy only when it represents the interests of the people, and when it is used to promote a minority political agenda that is detrimental to the interests of the people then the State is no longer legitimate.
State is the enemy
Only when the British State represents the interests of the indigenous British people as its primary political purpose will we accept its political legitimacy over us. Until then we regard it as the mechanism of our oppression and a weapon in the hands of the enemies of the British people.
Therefore we can see from this analysis of both the State and the principles of democracy that multi-culturalism and mass immigration have no moral, legal or political mandate that could ever guarantee their perpetual existence in our country. Just as Germany tore down the buildings of the Third Reich and Russia tore down the statues of Lenin and Marx it is a fact that politics evolves. The ideological artefact that is multi-culturalism is a product of political will and therefore can be reversed if the political will exists to do so. Nothing political is permanent.
The BNP have as much right to restore this country to its natural origins as the German people had to wipe away the remnants of National Socialism and the Russian people wipe away the bloody stain of Communism. To say that a political decision is itself irreversible or a historical inevitability is to return once more to the Marxist belief structure that created multi-culturalism. Marxism fell and multi-culturalism will fall as we will cause it to fall.
Do you have a comment to make about this article? If so write to the usual email address.
All material published on these pages represents the personal views of the individual columnists and should not be taken to represent official BNP policy, which is decided by the Chairman after a period of ongoing consultation and discussion at the annual conference each November.
The worst enemy of Aryan people in the world are dirty arabs ,we pure Aryans around the world vow to fight and bringing the freedom to the sacred land of Arya,Down with Fascist islam .
Enviar um comentário
<< Home