NOTA BREVE PARA POSSÍVEL FUTURA REFERÊNCIA
O príncipe saudita Al-Waleed bin Talal comprou 5,46% da Fox News.
Este sujeito culpou a política externa dos E.U.A., incluindo o apoio norte-americano a Israel, pelo ataque de 11 de Setembro.
Portanto, para quem costuma ver a FOX - não se admirem se, entretanto, as notícias aí dadas sobre terrorismo começarem a diminuir em termos de quantidade e de pormenores significativos...
Este sujeito culpou a política externa dos E.U.A., incluindo o apoio norte-americano a Israel, pelo ataque de 11 de Setembro.
Portanto, para quem costuma ver a FOX - não se admirem se, entretanto, as notícias aí dadas sobre terrorismo começarem a diminuir em termos de quantidade e de pormenores significativos...
posted by Caturo at quinta-feira, setembro 29, 2005
4 Comments:
Que raio, a Fox é dos Republicanos, os Accionistas haveriam de se ter oposto! São Aliados da Arábia Saudita, mas não dalguns Príncipes terroristas da Dinastia. O Rudolf Giuliani é que após o 9/11 mandou para trás com uma crítica um Príncipe Saudita que deu um cheque a New York pedindo, todavia, que os Estados Unidos mudassem a sua política em relação à Palestina e etc.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=539
Police threaten former soldier to remove England flag
27th September 2005
News article filed by BNP news team
Buy one, display it and upset the Keystone Cops
Britain’s “Keystone Cops” are at it once again. Pushing ahead with the dubious claim to be the most institutionally anti-white, anti-British police force in the country is West Yorkshire Police. Instead of using its limited resources, funded by taxpayers, to monitor and root out the fifth column of Islamic extremists in its midst, WYP officers in Leeds have warned a former soldier that he might be breaking the law because his public display of the England flag could be a “breach of the peace”.
Only in Britain with the institutional obsession of politically correct madness could such an incident occur. A flag, one of our national flags which has been carried into battle by kings and infantrymen alike for over 700 years is now considered by some PC jobsworth in West Yorkshire Police to be possibly illegal and all because of a complaint submitted by ONE disgruntled person in a neighbouring street!
Popular display
Hundreds of thousands of St. George’s flags fly from windows in homes and impromptu flag poles erected in gardens all over England; in almost all cases the reason for flying the flag is thoroughly apolitical and more likely to be championing the England soccer squad, or more recently the heroes of the England national cricket team who trounced the Australians and took back the Ashes. Whatever the reason, it is a personal and familial symbol of belonging to the English nation; championing and identifying with the English nation which has taken such a New Labour/Tory inspired battering in recent decades.
The soldier submitted his story to the BBC Leeds Online forum and said that (a few spelling corrections have been made, otherwise it is verbatim- Ed)
Posting
“I have recently arrived home, in Leeds, from work to be confronted by two police officers, who according to neighbours have been calling back and forth most of the day and at one point sat outside my door for over an hour during which time a number of neighbours were quizzed as to my whereabouts and "what sort of person I am". Many of whom thought that perhaps I had committed some heinous crime.
”I have flown the national flag of England on my property for the past two years since we bought this house, and I have been told, in no uncertain terms, that I risk arrest if I continue to do so.
”It appears that someone who walked past my house over the weekend has reported that she finds seeing the national flag of this country "uncomfortable" and has surmised that I am clearly a racist and should be stopped from doing so.
”The Police were quite candid in explaining that the complainant is Asian, probably Islamic, and lives in the area but not in my street, (a cul-de-sac), but can see my flag when she walks through the park that is situated in close proximity to me. This person's discomfort was not reported to the local police station but to a "Community Constable" of whom there are many since the London bombings.”
Decent “ordinary” chap
The writer gave a good account of himself as being a typical, hard working, decent, “middle” Englishman. He added that:
”I am former soldier with 26 years service, (including boy service) I'm in full-time employment, am married to a school teacher, have a young family, pay my taxes and bills and own my own home and, with the exception of driving offences, (speeding, parking) have an unblemished record. I do not belong to any political party and keep myself to myself, yet to be subjected to this is beyond belief and perhaps goes someway to explaining the rise of organisations like the BNP.”
Growing legions of rebels
Yes indeed, as more decent Britons, who have regrettably and hitherto squandered their (hard won) votes on the Old Gang trio of Labour, Tory and Lib Dems, or even worse, have been so lazy and apathetic that they have never cast a vote, but are seeing themselves marked down on the list of politically incorrect or troublesome rebels, then the more support the BNP will of course garner.
Whether intentional or not, the New Labour regime is now creating on an almost daily basis an army of new rebels; everyone, whether a council tax protesting senior citizen, a protesting haulier, a countryside wearer of a t-shirt which says something rather “rude” about the Prime Minister, all of these “rebels” become local and sometimes national champions and focal points for local community support; seeds by which scores of other rebels are created and harvested all ready, willing and able to be veritable thorns in the side of the New Labour regime; all ready, willing and capable of finding and aiming at the Achilles Heel of political correctness.
BNP’s gain
The British National Party is the natural home of these good Britons who are now seen by the Marxist establishment to be troublemakers or rebels, but who are in fact just decent hard working taxpayers seeking to secure their civil liberties and to carry out the same acts and utter the same words that just a generation ago were perfectly legal, proper and acceptable.
No Englishman should be prosecuted for displaying the flag of his country in his own country, just as no Korean, Norwegian or Syrian would ever expect to be prosecuted in his.
”Unhelpful”
The Leeds poster continued his story:
“There was no Senior Officer available to talk to me but the Duty Desk Officer told me that " some sections of the local community could find the flying of the English flag inflammatory especially at this time of heightened tensions in Leeds, the Islamic Community, like everyone else, have a right to go about their lawful business with (sic) feeling threatened or intimidated and if one of my officers felt that a breach of the peace could be caused then he has every right under current legislation to ask you to remove the offending article. It's not as if it's St George's day or anything so why do you want to fly it anyway?"
”I was also told that my actions are "unhelpful in the current situation" and that I "should be more sensitive to the feelings of the local community"
Reaction and response
This is either a silly and, given the circumstances of “heightened tension in Leeds” following the 07/07 bombings, a thoroughly irresponsible hoax involving the BBC, which we find unlikely or a genuine report of politically correct madness by West Yorkshire Police.
BNP website visitors need little reminding that three of the suicide bombers which claimed over fifty lives on London Transport on 07/07, came from or had family links to the Beeston area of Leeds. If any non-British flag, let’s say the flag of Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or even the display of Arabic slogans outside a mosque might just possibly be considered “offensive” by a Leeds pensioner walking his dog what would be the response of Leeds Division of West Yorkshire Police?
Answers on a very small postcard to the usual address!
What is needed now is that EVERY single non-Islamic householder in Leeds and beyond, show their solidarity with the ex-soldier and defiantly fly the St. George’s Cross or the Union Flag from every window, every car and at every available opportunity. That includes the thousands of mostly Anglican West Indians, as well as the Sikhs and Hindus in the city who have nothing in common with the Islamic extremists.
If the Keystone Cops in Leeds arrest and charge the BBC forum poster then every flag-waver in the city must be likewise arrested and charged. It is time for all good people to show solidarity and highlight the sheer stupidity of Leeds cops PC actions.
The merchandise operation of the BNP has a selection of national flags for purchase. Buy one, fly it today, tomorrow and forever more and be an instant rebel showing your disapproval of Blair and Co. Let’s make the English flag the symbol of national resistance against the New Labour dragon which seeks to devour our freedoms, our heritage, culture and our identity.
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=538
Museum pulls "offensive" art work
27th September 2005
News article filed by BNP news team
The Tate Britain museum has never knowingly previously been too worried about causing offence by pushing back the boundaries of acceptability. It is after all the gallery which gave us such gems as the talentless Tracey Emin's childish scribbles using the “f” word, other “artists” elephant dung daubings and “soft core” porno films.
However the sensitivities of Tunbridge Wells’ residents and genteel senior citizens seem to be not worthy of consideration by the Museum’s directors and trustees and it seems that only a Muslim of any age or either sex can be offended.
Exhibition work removed
The museum over the weekend removed a work made up of sacred texts from Christianity, Judaism and Islam torn and mounted on glass to avoid offending religious sensibilities following the July bombings on London Transport. The museum said it was particularly concerned that John Latham's piece “God Is Great” could upset Muslims. It pulled the work from an exhibition of Latham's art despite his objection.
“Having sought wide-ranging advice, Tate feels that to exhibit the work in London in the current sensitive climate, post July 7, would not be appropriate,” the museum said in a statement.
“God Is Great” consists of a large sheet of glass and copies of the Koran, the Bible and Judaism's Talmud that have been cut apart, with the pieces mounted on either side of the glass to make it appear that they are embedded in it.
“Cowardice” says artist
The museum put up a notice in the exhibition explaining the decision, including Latham's objection to it. Latham, 84, who made his name as a member of London's 1960s artistic avant garde, said the piece, which he made 10 years ago, was not anti-Muslim.
“Tate Britain have shown cowardice over this,” he told The Observer newspaper. “I think it's a daft thing to do because, if they want to help the militants, this is the way to do it.”
We have seen planning applications from Glasgow to Luton for licensed premises declined, delayed or modified following objections from Muslim residents.
We have seen barmy councils refuse to display the word “Christmas” and use seasonal decorations which might offend Muslims.
We have seen just last week Burger King remove a new brand of ice cream because of just ONE complaint by a supposed Muslim customer which is odd because BK have confirmed to us and many other correspondents that BK does not sell any halal products.
Endless list of offensive material
There seems to be no end to the list of activities, sights, sounds and words to which Muslims, such delicate souls that they are, get easily offended.
What about the offensive sight of a new Mosque being opened every 6 days in Britain, what about the offensive and frighteningly sight (to toddlers and the elderly) of women forced to completely cover their faces in bird-cage style garments, what about the offensive news of another honour killing on the streets of west Yorkshire or Lancashire, what about the offensive sight of halal products in Britain’s leading supermarket chains? Are indigenous Britons and other non-Muslims in Britain; Jews, Hindus, Sikhs and the secular not permitted to be offended and express that concern and have that concern listened to and acted upon?
Taking a peek at the Tate’s online visitors book suggest that they may have stirred up a hornet’s nest of popular anger and concern by those cultured, arty types who like the Tate’s own brand of sensationalist modern art. Perhaps the Tate will rethink its daft decision.
Every concession to supposed Islamic “offence” is a backward step for us in the west and another step forward for the advance of this middle eastern feudal religious cult.
Então agora onde é que estáo os críticos do costume?!?!
Se fosse um dos 'outros' a comprar nem que fosse 0,00000000001% de um canal de televisão lá vinha a cantilena de que era mais um prova da tal omnipresnete-conspiração-que-é-culpada-de-tudo-e-mais-alguma-coisa-até-do-escaravelho-da-batata.
Assim, como foi um mafomético (estes já podem) a comprar parece que já esté tudo bem e podemos ficar tranquilos.
Enviar um comentário
<< Home